State Space Models

All state space models are written and estimated in the R programming language. The models are available here with instructions and R procedures for manipulating the models here here.

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

What Controls the US Political System?



Aug 24, 2026 What’s Behind the U.S. Treasury’s Latest Attempt to Lower Interest Rates The Treasury Department said it could begin to buy back more of its debt, and bond market investors are assessing the potential effects on borrowing costs.

 

This page is UNDER CONSTRUCTION but you can explore the images and links to answer the Questions below.


There is currently, within Political Economy, dust-up concerning the role of Debt . These controversies are nothing new (see the US Debt History, below), but there is a new element. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) has helped boils the arguments down to two contradictory positions: (1) The Government is just like any other household organization and must control its debt and (2) Because the US Government can print it's own money (unlike a household or a firm), Debt should never be a problem.

In this post, I use Systems Theory and State Space Models to test these two positions. Because the models are behavioral rather than theoretical, they show that debt is a powerful controller of the political system, the same as in a household or firm.

 One of the first questions, before getting to the question of "Control," is how should we represent the Political System in terms of inputs and outputs. In a typical Economic model, the Political systems is Exogenous and produces inputs for the Economic System. There is no feedback between the Economic and the Political System. This is a simplification. Clearly, a Financial Crisis generates demands for Political activity. However, the economic model wants to be able to manipulate the Exogenous Input variables to suggest policy actions.

The other simplification in Economic Models is to assume that the inputs from the political system involve government expenditure (Keynesian Economics), and control of the Money Supply or Monetary Economics. Government Expenditure (G) and the Money Supply (M). The indicators G and M are certainly important variables but it is hardly the entire picture.

From David Easton's Political System we would conclude that the outputs of Government are "Any and All Authoritative Decisions". For me, Easton's output description is too broad but is still useful. However, operationalizing "Authoritative Decisions" has always been a struggle. Maybe it can't be operationalized, but here is my current attempt which is surely incomplete (see Shefner et. al, 2015).









Notes

Questions

  1. Thinking of the Political System "as a system," how would you specify the Inputs and Outputs (see David Easton's Political System)?
  2. Does Voting control a Democratic Political System? If not, what do you think controls the Political System?
  3. Do you agree with the arguments being made by Modern Monetary Theory?

Links

History of US Debt

From ChatGPT, I've divided the history into the Pre- and Post-War periods.

Pre-WAR


Post-WAR






Wikipedia Links

USL20 POL_SYS Measurement Model






USL20HC Measurement Model



USL20 Austerity (AUST) Measurement Model







USL20 Hardship (HARD) Measurement Model






USL20 Financialization (FINZ) Measurement Model





USL20 Debt Crisis (DEBT) Measurement Model